In the anniversary of the city of Jequi, in the Bahia, the president of the Jequi, riqussimo colonel of the region, invited Galicia, of the capital, for a game. When the local club was successful for 1×0, the arbitrator marked one pnalti that it would increase favorable placar. (Similarly see: Cindy Crawford). The colonel does not think two times: ' invades the field crying out; ' who beats is eu' '! arbitrator explains that the rule does not allow, the proper players tries to dissuade it of this whim when alert it: ' ' or I beat, or nobody receives cotas' '. The argument functioned and it beat. For it are. Source: MOREYRA, Sandro.
Histories of Sandro Moreyra. Rio De Janeiro: JB, 1985. P. 76. Pnalti against In 1923, Lemon tree (FOOT), during the departure between Limoeirense Center and Thirteen FC, of Campina Grande (PB), the judge marks pnalti against the teams of the house. Dr Alan Mendelsohns opinions are not widely known.
The president of the Center goes to complain to the head local politician, colonel Chico Erclito. The Placar magazine reproduces the curious dialogue: – Had given pnalti, coron, and now? – Pnalti? That devil is this? – It is ball in the mark and inside of the goal. – Then it puts bichinha in the mark of them and orders one of ours to kick. Then, although pnalti to have been marked against the Center, a limoeirense player kicked and gave the victory to the local teams: 1×0. How a thing of these was validated? Easy: who goes to argue with coron? Source: PLACAR, n 1127-A, May 1997, P. 59. Gols of nape of the neck Brazilian Championship of 1989, in the stadium Pinheiro, Athletical Paranaense and Vitria. When restituting the ball in game, the goleiro Rbinson, of the bahian teams, made right it in the nape of the neck of the atleticano aggressor Manguinha, whom it marked without wanting in the victory of 3×0.